EPYC 9184X vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.48
+99.6%
EPYC 9184X
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
31.81

EPYC 9754 outperforms EPYC 9184X by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9184X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12130
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.034.29
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.629.37
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Genoa-X (2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$4,928

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9184X has 317% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9184X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12816 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads25632
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size8x 73 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors71,000 million90,160 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9184X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9184X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9184X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9184X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9184X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.48
+99.6%
EPYC 9184X 31.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+99.5%
EPYC 9184X 50344

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.48 31.81
Physical cores 128 16
Threads 256 32
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 320 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 99.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

EPYC 9184X, on the other hand, has 12.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9184X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9184X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD EPYC 9184X
EPYC 9184X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 36 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9184X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or EPYC 9184X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.