Athlon II X4 630 vs EPYC 9754

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Athlon II X4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	10	2140
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.62	6.02
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Bergamo	Propus (2009−2011)
Release date	13 June 2023 (1 year ago)	September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$63
Current price	$7724	$24 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X4 630 has 30% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Athlon II X4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	128	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	256	4
Base clock speed	2.25 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.1 GHz	2.8 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	256 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	5 nm	45 nm
Die size	8x 73 mm2	169 mm2
Number of transistors	71,000 million	300 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Athlon II X4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	SP5	AM3
Power consumption (TDP)	360 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Athlon II X4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
AVX	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Athlon II X4 630 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Athlon II X4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR5

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Athlon II X4 630.

PCIe version	5.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	128	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 outperforms Athlon II X4 630 by 4483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	63.25	1.38
Physical cores	128	4
Threads	256	4
Chip lithography	5 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	360 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Athlon II X4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---