Core 2 Duo E6700 vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.25
+9783%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by a whopping 9783% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Core 2 Duo E6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking102666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.620.98
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore 2 Duo (Desktop)
Architecture codenameBergamoConroe (2006−2007)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)no data
Current price$7724 $18

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9754 has 371% better value for money than Core 2 Duo E6700.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Core 2 Duo E6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1282 (Dual-core)
Threads2562
Base clock speed2.25 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus supportno data1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm65 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Core 2 Duo E6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Core 2 Duo E6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Core 2 Duo E6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Core 2 Duo E6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Core 2 Duo E6700.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.25
+9783%
Core 2 Duo E6700 0.64

EPYC 9754 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 9783% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 9754 97836
+9782%
Core 2 Duo E6700 990

EPYC 9754 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 9782% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.25 0.64
Physical cores 128 2
Threads 256 2
Chip lithography 5 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 65 Watt

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6700 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo E6700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Core 2 Duo E6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Core 2 Duo E6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 80 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Core 2 Duo E6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.