Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX vs EPYC 9654P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
73.10
+19.1%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
61.37

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking716
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.8811.33
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.8616.29
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,625$3,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has 503% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9632 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads19264
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache6 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache96 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size12x 72 mm24x 71 mm2
Number of transistors78,840 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654P 73.10
+19.1%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 61.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9654P 113949
+19.1%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95664

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 73.10 61.37
Recency 10 November 2022 19 October 2023
Physical cores 96 32
Threads 192 64
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 9654P has a 19.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 2.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 18 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654P or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.