Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs EPYC 9654P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
73.67
+524%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
11.80

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U by a whopping 524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5614
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.16no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameGenoaPhoenix (Zen4)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,625no data
Current price$5987 (0.6x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores966 (Hexa-Core)
Threads19212
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache384 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm4 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800no data
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654P 73.67
+524%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 11.80

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U by 524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 9654P 113949
+524%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 18249

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U by 524% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 73.67 11.80
Recency 10 November 2022 23 May 2023
Physical cores 96 6
Threads 192 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 15 Watt

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654P or Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.