Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs EPYC 9654

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
76.66
+548%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
11.83

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U by a whopping 548% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency19.4271.91
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,805no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores966 (Hexa-Core)
Threads19212
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache6 MB384 KB
L2 cache96 MB6 MB
L3 cache384 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm4 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800no data
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654 76.66
+548%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 11.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9654 117317
+548%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 18100

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 9654 1827
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 2172
+18.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 9654 18626
+135%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 7939

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 76.66 11.83
Recency 10 November 2022 23 May 2023
Physical cores 96 6
Threads 192 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 9654 has a 548% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 2300% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654 or Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.