Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs EPYC 9174F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
34.93
+56.1%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 28 Watt
22.37

EPYC 9174F outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking105231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.73no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.3375.61
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Strix Point (2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)July 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed4.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
Multiplier41no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm4 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 890M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9174F 34.93
+56.1%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 22.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9174F 55485
+56.1%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 35534

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.93 22.37
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 24
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 9174F has a 56.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1042.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9174F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 97 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9174F or Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.