Celeron G6900E vs EPYC 7742

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking39not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.69no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,950no data
Current price$1656 (0.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1282
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache4 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR41700
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E.

PCIe versionno data5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7742 1204
Celeron G6900E 1559
+29.5%

Celeron G6900E outperforms EPYC 7742 by 29% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7742 11782
+319%
Celeron G6900E 2815

EPYC 7742 outperforms Celeron G6900E by 319% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 4 January 2022
Physical cores 64 2
Threads 128 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 46 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7742 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7742 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742
Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 128 votes

Rate EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7742 or Celeron G6900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.