Celeron N6211 vs EPYC 7713P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7713P
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.84
+3519%

EPYC 7713P outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 3519% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7713P and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking312193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.723.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCElkhart Lake
Power efficiency21.5020.56
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,010$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7713P has 102% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7713P and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1282
Base clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MBno data
L2 cache32 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7713P and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP3BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7713P and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7713P and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7713P and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7713P and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7713P 52.84
+3519%
Celeron N6211 1.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7713P 81201
+3517%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.84 1.46
Recency 12 January 2021 17 July 2022
Physical cores 64 2
Threads 128 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7713P has a 3519.2% higher aggregate performance score, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 3650% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7713P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7713P is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7713P and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7713P
EPYC 7713P
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7713P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7713P or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.