EPYC 7532 vs EPYC 7642

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7642
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
37.01
+11.4%
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
33.21

EPYC 7642 outperforms EPYC 7532 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking91118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.5715.71
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads9664
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier2324
L1 cache96K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7642 37.01
+11.4%
EPYC 7532 33.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7642 58795
+11.4%
EPYC 7532 52755

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7642 1274
+5.5%
EPYC 7532 1208

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7642 10479
+3.4%
EPYC 7532 10136

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.01 33.21
Recency 7 August 2019 19 February 2020
Physical cores 48 32
Threads 96 64
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 7642 has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7642 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7532 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7642 or EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.