EPYC 7642 vs EPYC 7402

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7402
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
29.66

EPYC 7642 outperforms EPYC 7402 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7402 and EPYC 7642 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14785
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.924.79
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,783$4,775

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7402 has 128% better value for money than EPYC 7642.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7402 and EPYC 7642 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads4896
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier2823
L1 cache1.5 MB3 MB
L2 cache12 MB24 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7402 and EPYC 7642 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7402 and EPYC 7642. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7402 and EPYC 7642 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7402 and EPYC 7642. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7402 29.66
EPYC 7642 37.66
+27%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7402 45873
EPYC 7642 58248
+27%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7402 1315
+3.2%
EPYC 7642 1274

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7402 11865
+13.2%
EPYC 7642 10479

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.66 37.66
Physical cores 24 48
Threads 48 96
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7402 has 25% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7642, on the other hand, has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7642 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7402 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7402 and EPYC 7642, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7402
EPYC 7402
AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7402 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7402 or EPYC 7642, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.