Apple M4 Max (16 cores) vs EPYC 75F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.13
+54.2%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.97

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Apple M4 Max (16 cores) by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 75F3 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M4
Power efficiency14.5829.41
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,860no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 75F3 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2.95 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.51 GHz
Multiplier29.5no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+3 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 75F3 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 75F3 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 75F3 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 75F3 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 40-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 75F3 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores).

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.13 27.97
Recency 15 March 2021 30 October 2024
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 90 Watt

EPYC 75F3 has a 54.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M4 Max (16 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 211.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max (16 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 75F3 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 75F3 or Apple M4 Max (16 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.