Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs EPYC 7573X
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7573X outperforms Apple M3 Max 16-Core by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7573X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 38 | 224 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.45 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Apple M3 |
Architecture codename | Milan-X (2022) | no data |
Release date | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Current price | $5250 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7573X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 64 | 1612 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.748 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 768 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 92000 Million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7573X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | SP3 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 78 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7573X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | no data |
AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7573X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7573X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7573X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 44.89 | 21.83 |
Recency | 22 March 2022 | 30 October 2023 |
Physical cores | 32 | 16 |
Threads | 64 | 1612 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 78 Watt |
The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Max 16-Core in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7573X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.