Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs EPYC 7551P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551P
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
24.91
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
26.76
+7.4%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms EPYC 7551P by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking205186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.32no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M3
Power efficiency12.6231.28
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)no data
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.06 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache3 MBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors19200 Million92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551P 24.91
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 26.76
+7.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7551P 38126
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 40959
+7.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.91 26.76
Recency 20 June 2017 30 October 2023
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 78 Watt

EPYC 7551P has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core, on the other hand, has a 7.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core.

Be aware that EPYC 7551P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551P
EPYC 7551P
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 78 votes

Rate EPYC 7551P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 252 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551P or Apple M3 Max 16-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.