Apple M2 Max vs EPYC 7551P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551P
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
24.64
+67.5%

EPYC 7551P outperforms Apple M2 Max by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551P and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking181456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.34no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M-Series
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)no data
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data
Current price$529 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551P and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6412
Base clock speed2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)36 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551P and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551P and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551P and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551P and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551P and Apple M2 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551P 24.64
+67.5%
Apple M2 Max 14.71

EPYC 7551P outperforms Apple M2 Max by 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7551P 38117
+44.1%
Apple M2 Max 26460

EPYC 7551P outperforms Apple M2 Max by 44% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.64 14.71
Recency 29 June 2017 17 January 2023
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 79 Watt

The EPYC 7551P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 Max in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7551P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551P and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551P
EPYC 7551P
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 66 votes

Rate EPYC 7551P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 220 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551P or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.