Xeon W-3335 vs EPYC 7532

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
34.30
+35%

EPYC 7532 outperforms Xeon W-3335 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking98172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.8229.22
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)29 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$800 $1608

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7532 has 29% better value for money than Xeon W-3335.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache2 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketSocket SP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335.

PCIe versionno data4
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7532 34.30
+35%
Xeon W-3335 25.40

EPYC 7532 outperforms Xeon W-3335 by 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7532 53051
+35%
Xeon W-3335 39293

EPYC 7532 outperforms Xeon W-3335 by 35% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.30 25.40
Recency 19 February 2020 29 July 2021
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

The EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3335 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7532 and Xeon W-3335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532
Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 18 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7532 or Xeon W-3335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.