Celeron G6900TE vs EPYC 74F3

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	66	2040
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.16	no data
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	AMD EPYC	no data
Architecture codename	Milan (2021)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date	15 March 2021 (3 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,900	no data
Current price	$2990 (1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	24 (Tetracosa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	48	2
Base clock speed	2.8 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	2.4 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	80K (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache	256 MB (shared)	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	7 nm+	10 nm
Die size	4x 81 mm2	no data
Number of transistors	33,200 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	SP3	1700
Power consumption (TDP)	240 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
TSX	no data	+

Security technologies

EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-3200	DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.795 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version	4.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	128	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Celeron G6900TE by 2463% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	39.22	1.53
Recency	15 March 2021	4 January 2022
Physical cores	24	2
Threads	48	2
Chip lithography	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	240 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---