Celeron N5095A vs EPYC 73F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.81
+1016%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Celeron N5095A by a whopping 1016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1321630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.52no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)no data
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,521no data
Current price$2271 (0.6x MSRP)$92

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache1 MBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)4 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 LPDDR4x
Maximum memory size4 TiB16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes1288
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 73F3 29.81
+1016%
Celeron N5095A 2.67

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Celeron N5095A by 1016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 73F3 46103
+1017%
Celeron N5095A 4126

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Celeron N5095A by 1017% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.81 2.67
Recency 12 January 2021 1 July 2021
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 15 Watt

The EPYC 73F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095A in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 73F3 and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 80 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 73F3 or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.