Ryzen 5 8400F vs EPYC 7371

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
20.32
+30.3%

EPYC 7371 outperforms Ryzen 5 8400F by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking286465
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.5859.63
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency9.2621.87
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date13 November 2018 (5 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 8400F has 969% better value for money than EPYC 7371.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors19200 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 20.32
+30.3%
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7371 31094
+30.4%
Ryzen 5 8400F 23852

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.32 15.59
Recency 13 November 2018 1 April 2024
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7371 has a 30.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 8400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 207.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 8400F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 8400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 162 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.