EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen 5 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.62
EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
20.32
+136%

EPYC 7371 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 7371 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking901286
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.015.58
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency12.099.26
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date13 April 2018 (6 years ago)13 November 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$1,550

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 79% better value for money than EPYC 7371.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 7371 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3431
L1 cache576 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache3 MB8 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4800 Million19200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 7371 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 7371. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 7371 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 7371. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 7371.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600 8.62
EPYC 7371 20.32
+136%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13189
EPYC 7371 31094
+136%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.62 20.32
Recency 13 April 2018 13 November 2018
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7371, on the other hand, has a 135.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 7371, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14859 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or EPYC 7371, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.