Apple M2 Pro vs EPYC 7313

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.08
+79.8%
Apple M2 Pro
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 2424 Watt
13.95

EPYC 7313 outperforms Apple M2 Pro by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking202537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.16no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency15.03no data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed3 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB3.3 MB
L2 cache8 MB36 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors16,600 million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt2424 ‑ 3504 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313 and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313 and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313 and Apple M2 Pro.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313 25.08
+79.8%
Apple M2 Pro 13.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7313 39091
+79.8%
Apple M2 Pro 21740

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.08 13.95
Recency 12 January 2021 17 January 2023
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 2424 Watt

EPYC 7313 has a 79.8% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and 1463.9% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 Pro in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 172 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313 or Apple M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.