Apple M4 (8 cores) vs EPYC 7313

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
24.04
+85.9%
Apple M4 (8 cores)
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 5 Watt
12.93

EPYC 7313 outperforms Apple M4 (8 cores) by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking255672
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M4
Power efficiency6.00100.00
DesignerAMDApple
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date15 March 2021 (4 years ago)28 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313 and M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+3 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313 and M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313 and M4 (8 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313 and M4 (8 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313 and M4 (8 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 8-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313 and M4 (8 cores).

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7313 24.04
+85.9%
Apple M4 (8 cores) 12.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7313 38644
+85.8%
Apple M4 (8 cores) 20795

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.04 12.93
Recency 15 March 2021 28 October 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 5 Watt

EPYC 7313 has a 85.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M4 (8 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 3000% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 (8 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 (8 cores) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313
Apple M4 (8 cores)
M4 (8 cores)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 votes

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 39 votes

Rate M4 (8 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7313 and M4 (8 cores), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.