EPYC 7D13 vs Apple M2 Pro
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 687 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 17 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 10 November 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M2 Pro and EPYC 7D13 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 36 |
| Threads | 12 | 72 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 0.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 3.3 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 36 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 192 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 6x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 40000 Million | 24,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on M2 Pro and EPYC 7D13 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 36 MB + 24 MB | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 Pro and EPYC 7D13. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 Pro and EPYC 7D13 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 Pro and EPYC 7D13. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 Pro and EPYC 7D13.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 29 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 January 2023 | 10 November 2021 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 36 |
| Threads | 12 | 72 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 36 Watt | 95 Watt |
Apple M2 Pro has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 163.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7D13, on the other hand, has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M2 Pro and AMD EPYC 7D13. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M2 Pro is a notebook processor while EPYC 7D13 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
