Apple M2 Pro vs EPYC 7C13

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7C13
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
43.29
+248%

EPYC 7C13 outperforms M2 Pro by a whopping 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking69687
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency20.64no data
DesignerAMDApple
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date2021 (4 years ago)17 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7C13 and M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads12812
Base clock speed2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)36 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 million40000 Million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7C13 and M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt36 MB + 24 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and M2 Pro are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and M2 Pro.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7C13 43.29
+248%
Apple M2 Pro 12.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7C13 76363
+248%
Samples: 54
Apple M2 Pro 21943
Samples: 816

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.29 12.44
Physical cores 64 12
Threads 128 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 36 Watt

EPYC 7C13 has a 248% higher aggregate performance score, and 433.3% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7C13 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 Pro in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7C13 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7C13
EPYC 7C13
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7C13 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 230 votes

Rate M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7C13 and M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.