Athlon 3000G vs EPYC 7272

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7272
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
15.90
+462%
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.83

EPYC 7272 outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7272 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4231670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.615.27
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Athlon
Power efficiency12.497.62
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)7 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$625$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7272 has 120% better value for money than Athlon 3000G.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7272 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplier2935
L1 cache96 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2209.78 mm2?
Number of transistors3,800 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7272 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7272 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7272 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7272 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB64 GB?
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7272 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1286

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7272 15.90
+462%
Athlon 3000G 2.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7272 25161
+461%
Athlon 3000G 4482

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.90 2.83
Recency 7 August 2019 7 November 2019
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7272 has a 461.8% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 242.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7272 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7272 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7272 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2093 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7272 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.