Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs EPYC 7272

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	397	64
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.95	no data
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	AMD EPYC	AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codename	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date	7 August 2019 (5 years ago)	14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$625	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads	24	64
Base clock speed	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	4.2 GHz
Multiplier	29	35
L1 cache	768 KB	2 MB
L2 cache	6 MB	16 MB
L3 cache	64 MB (shared)	128 MB
Chip lithography	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Die size	192 mm2	74 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	95 °C
Number of transistors	3,800 million	23540 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	SP3	sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Precision Boost 2	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	2 TiB
Max memory channels	8	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.763 GB/s	204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe version	4.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	128	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	16.53	40.44
Recency	7 August 2019	14 July 2020
Physical cores	12	32
Threads	24	64
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---