EPYC 7313 vs EPYC 7262

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
13.61
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.60
+88.1%

EPYC 7313 outperforms EPYC 7262 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking563196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.3217.53
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.9915.03
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$575$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313 has 70% better value for money than EPYC 7262.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier3230
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die size192 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors3,800 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7262 13.61
EPYC 7313 25.60
+88.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7262 20779
EPYC 7313 39091
+88.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.61 25.60
Recency 7 August 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32

EPYC 7313 has a 88.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7262 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7262 or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.