Intel Xeon Gold 5218R vs AMD EPYC 7262

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

EPYC 7262
13.54

Xeon Gold 5218R outperforms EPYC 7262 by 19% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking484366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money10.8514.33
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years old)24 February 2020 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$575$1,273
Current price$746 (1.3x MSRP)$1407 (1.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5218R has 32% better value for money than EPYC 7262.

Technical specs

EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1640
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)1.25 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)20 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)27.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data87 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2667
Maximum memory size4 TiB1 TB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7262 13.54
Xeon Gold 5218R 16.11
+19%

Xeon Gold 5218R outperforms EPYC 7262 by 19% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7262 20795
Xeon Gold 5218R 24742
+19%

Xeon Gold 5218R outperforms EPYC 7262 by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 13.54 16.11
Recency 7 August 2019 24 February 2020
Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 40
Cost $575 $1273
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 125 Watt

The Xeon Gold 5218R is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7262 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7262 and Xeon Gold 5218R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R
Xeon Gold 5218R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 vote

Rate AMD EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Gold 5218R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7262 or Xeon Gold 5218R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.