Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs E2-9000
Primary details
Comparing E2-9000 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2669 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | Pentium 4-M |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Northwood (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | no data |
| Current price | $78 | $49 |
Detailed specifications
E2-9000 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on E2-9000 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Single-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization, | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
E2-9000 outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by 151% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 outperforms E2-9000 by 582% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 30 Watt |
We couldn't decide between E2-9000 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
