Atom D410 vs E2-9000
Primary details
Comparing E2-9000 and Atom D410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2669 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 4 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $636 |
| Current price | $78 | $12 (0x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
E2-9000 and Atom D410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | 123 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on E2-9000 and Atom D410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Atom D410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Single-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization, | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
E2-9000 and Atom D410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Atom D410 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Atom D410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) | Intel GMA 3150 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E2-9000 outperforms Atom D410 by 446% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 4 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
We couldn't decide between E2-9000 and Atom D410. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and Atom D410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
