Atom D410 vs A6-9225

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and Atom D410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2462not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$636
Current price$451 $12 (0x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and Atom D410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.67 GHz
L1 cache160 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size124.5 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Atom D410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Atom D410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A6-9225 and Atom D410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Atom D410 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Atom D410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)Intel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9225 1335
+642%
Atom D410 180

A6-9225 outperforms Atom D410 by 642% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 4 January 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between A6-9225 and Atom D410. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Atom D410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
Intel Atom D410
Atom D410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2224 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 113 votes

Rate Atom D410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Atom D410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.