Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs E2-3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2754not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Merom-2M (2008)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM1P
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6370Dno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 September 2011 1 May 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

E2-3200 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that E2-3200 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3200
E2-3200
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 vote

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 285 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3200 or Celeron Dual-Core T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.