Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs E2-3200
Aggregate performance score
E2-3200 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2800 | 2974 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 0.89 | 1.16 |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Merom-2M (2008) |
| Release date | 7 September 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM1 | P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 6370D | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.61 | 0.43 |
| Recency | 7 September 2011 | 1 May 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
E2-3200 has a 41.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron Dual-Core T1400, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
The E2-3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Note that E2-3200 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
