Athlon II X4 641 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II X4 641 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3251 | 2463 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.41 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) | 6 February 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II X4 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 228 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II X4 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | P | FM1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 100 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II X4 641 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II X4 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.39 | 1.31 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 6 February 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 100 Watt |
Athlon II X4 641 has a 235.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 412% lower power consumption.
The AMD Athlon II X4 641 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 641 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
