FX-4150 vs E2-3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000 and FX-4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1779
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.47
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$202 $90

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-3000 and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache1024 KB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000 and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000 and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000 and FX-4150 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000 and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000 and FX-4150 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3000 and FX-4150 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000 and FX-4150.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-3000 726
FX-4150 3327
+358%

FX-4150 outperforms E2-3000 by 358% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 23 October 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

We couldn't decide between E2-3000 and FX-4150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-3000 is a notebook processor while FX-4150 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000 and FX-4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000
E2-3000
AMD FX-4150
FX-4150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate FX-4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000 or FX-4150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.