FX-4150 vs FX-9830P

Place in the ranking	1870	1872
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	no data
Power efficiency	5.68	2.08
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date	31 May 2016 (8 years ago)	23 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9830P and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3 GHz	3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.7 GHz	4 GHz
L1 cache	320 KB	192 KB
L2 cache	1 MB (per module)	4 MB
L3 cache	no data	8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Die size	250 mm²	315 mm²
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	no data
Number of transistors	3,100 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on FX-9830P and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FP4	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9830P and FX-4150 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9830P and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3, DDR4

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9830P and FX-4150.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9830P 2.10
+0.5%

FX-4150 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9830P 3332
+0.2%

FX-4150 3327

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.10	2.09
Recency	31 May 2016	23 October 2012
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	95 Watt

FX-9830P has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-9830P and FX-4150.

Be aware that FX-9830P is a notebook processor while FX-4150 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9830P and FX-4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.