Ryzen 7 7840U vs E2-1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Phoenix-U (Zen 4)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$95 no data

Detailed specifications

E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm4 nm
Die size75 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFP8
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
PowerNow+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7340AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-1800 447
Ryzen 7 7840U 25007
+5494%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 5494% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E2-1800 114
Ryzen 7 7840U 2090
+1733%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 1733% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E2-1800 195
Ryzen 7 7840U 8725
+4374%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 4374% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E2-1800 1110
Ryzen 7 7840U 6669
+501%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 501% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-1800 2121
Ryzen 7 7840U 38490
+1715%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 1715% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-1800 1083
Ryzen 7 7840U 12482
+1053%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 1053% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E2-1800 69.05
Ryzen 7 7840U 3.51
+1867%

E2-1800 outperforms Ryzen 7 7840U by 1867% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E2-1800 1
Ryzen 7 7840U 23
+3436%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 3436% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E2-1800 0.33
Ryzen 7 7840U 2.79
+745%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 745% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-1800 0.1
Ryzen 7 7840U 8.5
+8350%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 8350% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-1800 486
Ryzen 7 7840U 5723
+1078%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 1078% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-1800 3
Ryzen 7 7840U 109
+3238%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 3238% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-1800 18
Ryzen 7 7840U 237
+1194%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms E2-1800 by 1194% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 28 Watt

We couldn't decide between E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that E2-1800 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-1800 and Ryzen 7 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-1800
E2-1800
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 159 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 163 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-1800 or Ryzen 7 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.