Ryzen 7 3800XT vs E-350

VS

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated470
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.84
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data13.39
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography40 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size75 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1AM4
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 421
Ryzen 7 3800XT 23603
+5506%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-350 105
Ryzen 7 3800XT 1771
+1587%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-350 179
Ryzen 7 3800XT 8574
+4690%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E-350 1049
Ryzen 7 3800XT 6035
+476%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E-350 2005
Ryzen 7 3800XT 40528
+1921%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E-350 68.8
Ryzen 7 3800XT 3.74
+1740%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E-350 1
Ryzen 7 3800XT 24
+3864%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 16 June 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 105 Watt

E-350 has 483.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 3800XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 3800XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Ryzen 7 3800XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Ryzen 7 3800XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 306 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3800XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or Ryzen 7 3800XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.