Xeon Gold 6538Y vs E-240
Primary details
Comparing E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | no data |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | $118 | no data |
Detailed specifications
E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 79 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR5-5200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 1 October 2023 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 225 Watt |
We couldn't decide between E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E-240 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6538Y is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-240 and Xeon Gold 6538Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
