EPYC 9174F vs Core i9-10900K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900K
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
14.80
EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
35.87
+142%

EPYC 9174F outperforms i9-10900K by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking44687
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.2911.44
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Genoa
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$3,850
Current price$327 (0.7x MSRP)$2950 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-10900K has 156% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size206 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900K 14.80
EPYC 9174F 35.87
+142%

EPYC 9174F outperforms Core i9-10900K by 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-10900K 22894
EPYC 9174F 55485
+142%

EPYC 9174F outperforms Core i9-10900K by 142% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10900K 1752
EPYC 9174F 2217
+26.5%

EPYC 9174F outperforms Core i9-10900K by 27% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10900K 9134
EPYC 9174F 15484
+69.5%

EPYC 9174F outperforms Core i9-10900K by 70% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.80 35.87
Recency 30 April 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Cost $488 $3850
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 320 Watt

The EPYC 9174F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900K in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10900K is a desktop processor while EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900K and EPYC 9174F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900K
Core i9-10900K
AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1183 votes

Rate Core i9-10900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900K or EPYC 9174F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.