Core i7-13700K vs Core m7-6Y75

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m7-6Y75
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.49
Core i7-13700K
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
30.09
+1919%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by a whopping 1919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2054131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.90
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core m7Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Raptor Lake-S
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$393$409
Current price$773 (2x MSRP)$474 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size99 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 515Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.6 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m7-6Y75 1.49
i7-13700K 30.09
+1919%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 1919% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

m7-6Y75 2312
i7-13700K 46549
+1913%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 1913% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

m7-6Y75 3854
i7-13700K 11278
+193%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 193% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

m7-6Y75 6302
i7-13700K 85748
+1261%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 1261% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

m7-6Y75 2730
i7-13700K 18153
+565%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 565% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

m7-6Y75 19
i7-13700K 2.31
+723%

Core m7-6Y75 outperforms Core i7-13700K by 723% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

m7-6Y75 2
i7-13700K 53
+2045%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 2045% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

m7-6Y75 205
i7-13700K 4508
+2099%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 2099% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

m7-6Y75 102
i7-13700K 303
+197%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 197% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

m7-6Y75 1.08
i7-13700K 3.66
+239%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 239% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m7-6Y75 1.7
i7-13700K 15.8
+829%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 829% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m7-6Y75 1625
i7-13700K 12835
+690%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 690% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m7-6Y75 16
i7-13700K 232
+1397%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 1397% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m7-6Y75 89
i7-13700K 406
+356%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 356% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 30.09
Integrated graphics card 1.36 6.14
Recency 1 September 2015 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 24
Cost $393 $409
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 125 Watt

The Core i7-13700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m7-6Y75 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core m7-6Y75 is a notebook processor while Core i7-13700K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m7-6Y75 and Core i7-13700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m7-6Y75
Core m7-6Y75
Intel Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 32 votes

Rate Core m7-6Y75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1153 votes

Rate Core i7-13700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m7-6Y75 or Core i7-13700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.