Xeon W-3223 vs i9-7900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7900X
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
13.25
+23.8%
Xeon W-3223
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
10.70

Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon W-3223 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking560726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.8718.61
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency8.966.33
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date26 June 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3223 has 548% better value for money than i9-7900X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3335
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache14 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket R4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7900X 13.25
+23.8%
Xeon W-3223 10.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7900X 21049
+23.8%
Xeon W-3223 17003

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-7900X 1443
+5.3%
Xeon W-3223 1371

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-7900X 8862
+9.1%
Xeon W-3223 8125

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.25 10.70
Recency 26 June 2017 3 June 2019
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 160 Watt

i9-7900X has a 23.8% higher aggregate performance score, 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3223, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Core i9-7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3223 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7900X is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3223 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Xeon W-3223, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
Intel Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 216 votes

Rate Core i9-7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3223 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7900X or Xeon W-3223, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.