Xeon W-3223 vs Core i7-9800X
Aggregate performance score
i7-9800X outperforms Xeon W-3223 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 628 | 655 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 47.31 | 22.30 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Xeon W |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 19 October 2018 (5 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $589 | $749 |
| Current price | $97 (0.2x MSRP) | $480 (0.6x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-9800X has 112% better value for money than Xeon W-3223.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 16.5 MB (shared) | 16.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 68 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA2066 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 160 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | + |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Security technologies
Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 44 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-9800X outperforms Xeon W-3223 by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-9800X outperforms Xeon W-3223 by 5% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-9800X outperforms Xeon W-3223 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon W-3223 outperforms Core i7-9800X by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.68 | 11.10 |
| Recency | 19 October 2018 | 3 June 2019 |
| Cost | $589 | $749 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 160 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223.
Note that Core i7-9800X is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3223 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9800X and Xeon W-3223, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
