Xeon Gold 5415+ vs i9-13900F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
33.46
+105%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon Gold 5415+ by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking123425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.4534.44
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency46.949.91
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524$1,076

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900F has 67% better value for money than Xeon Gold 5415+.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)22.5 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA17004677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900F 33.46
+105%
Xeon Gold 5415+ 16.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900F 51199
+105%
Xeon Gold 5415+ 24951

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.46 16.30
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

i9-13900F has a 105.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5415+ in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5415+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 5415+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+
Xeon Gold 5415+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 130 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5415 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900F or Xeon Gold 5415+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.