Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-13900F

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	105	49
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	68.30	18.37
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Architecture codename	Raptor Lake-S	Sapphire Rapids
Release date	4 January 2023 (1 year ago)	1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$508	$3898

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900F has 272% better value for money than Xeon w9-3475X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	24 (Tetracosa-Core)	36
Threads	32	72
Base clock speed	2 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	5.5 GHz	4.8 GHz
L1 cache	80K (per core)	80K (per core)
L2 cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	36 MB (shared)	82.5 MB
Chip lithography	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	257 mm2	4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	74 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1700	FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	+	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	+	+
Status	Launched	Launched

Security technologies

Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	192 GB	4 TB
Max memory channels	2	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	89.6 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	no data	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X.

PCIe version	5.0 and 4.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	20	112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i9-13900F by 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	33.10	42.16
Physical cores	24	36
Threads	32	72
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	300 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---