Celeron E3200 vs i9-10940X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10940X
2019
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
18.09
+3250%

Core i9-10940X outperforms Celeron E3200 by a whopping 3250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3432819
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.88
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date19 October 2019 (4 years ago)30 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s DMI3 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10940X 18.09
+3250%
Celeron E3200 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10940X 27902
+3226%
Celeron E3200 839

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.09 0.54
Recency 19 October 2019 30 August 2009
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

i9-10940X has a 3250% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron E3200, on the other hand, has 153.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10940X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10940X and Celeron E3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10940X
Core i9-10940X
Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 98 votes

Rate Core i9-10940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 75 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10940X or Celeron E3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.