EPYC 7F72 vs Core i7
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7F72 outperforms Core i7 by a whopping 1283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7 and EPYC 7F72 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1680 | 101 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.34 | 8.30 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | 14 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,450 |
| Current price | $274 | $3606 (1.5x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 7F72 has 55% better value for money than Core i7.
Detailed specifications
Core i7 and EPYC 7F72 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 192 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 74 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7 and EPYC 7F72 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7 and EPYC 7F72. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7 and EPYC 7F72 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7 and EPYC 7F72. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7 and EPYC 7F72.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7F72 outperforms Core i7 by 1283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7F72 outperforms Core i7 by 587% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.46 | 34.01 |
| Recency | 1 October 2023 | 14 April 2020 |
The EPYC 7F72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7 in performance tests.
Note that Core i7 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7F72 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7 and EPYC 7F72, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
