Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs i7-8700K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-8700K
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.58
+3986%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.21

Core i7-8700K outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ by a whopping 3986% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8763209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.50no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Mobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency8.550.32
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date5 October 2017 (7 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128K
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12288 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size149 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151754
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-

Security technologies

Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR1
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8700K 8.58
+3986%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-8700K 13622
+3991%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 333

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-8700K 4.16
+1931%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 84.5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.58 0.21
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 62 Watt

i7-8700K has a 3985.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, on the other hand, has 53.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-8700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-8700K is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8700K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8700K
Core i7-8700K
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2645 votes

Rate Core i7-8700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8700K or Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.