Atom N570 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.21
Atom N570
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.21

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32203205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64Intel Atom
Power efficiency0.322.21
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)1 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz666 MHz
L1 cache128K64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data45 nm
Die size193 mm287 mm2
Number of transistors106 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 0.21
Atom N570 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 333
Atom N570 341
+2.4%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 84.5
Atom N570 59
+43.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 8 Watt

Atom N570 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 675% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom N570, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Intel Atom N570
Atom N570

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 131 vote

Rate Atom N570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ or Atom N570, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.