EPYC 7H12 vs i7-8670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated45
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date1 January 2018 (6 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads12128
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache384 KB4 MB
L2 cache1.5 MB32 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size149 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket1151TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
SIPP+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2018 18 September 2019
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 12 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

i7-8670 has 330.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-8670 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8670 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8670
Core i7-8670
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Core i7-8670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8670 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.