i5-7440EQ vs Ryzen 5 2600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.30
+131%
Core i5-7440EQ
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
3.60

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i5-7440EQ by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9151516
Place by popularity21not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.080.67
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Core i5
Power efficiency12.087.57
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 1404% better value for money than i5-7440EQ.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier3429
L1 cache96K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600 8.30
+131%
i5-7440EQ 3.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13188
+131%
i5-7440EQ 5711

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.30 3.60
Recency 19 April 2018 3 January 2017
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has a 130.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

i5-7440EQ, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-7440EQ in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while Core i5-7440EQ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-7440EQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i5-7440EQ
Core i5-7440EQ

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15187 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-7440EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or Core i5-7440EQ, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.